구상금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The facts following the facts are either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 22 (including the branch numbers).
The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Asch Rexton vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicles”). The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B Cost Star vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).
B. Around 17:30 on May 23, 2014, the Defendant vehicle in front of the Plaintiff vehicle was waiting to turn to the left at a shooting distance from the 5th Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) caused an accident in which the part of the Defendant vehicle in front of the Plaintiff vehicle
C. On May 24, 2014, the Plaintiff’s driver of the vehicle called C, Dong-based D, D, and E (hereinafter referred to as “C, etc.”) received medical treatment at the Adong-dong Hospital as an incorporated foundation.
C From May 26, 2014 to the same year
6.2. From May 26, 2014 to May 26, 2014 to the scopical and scopical base;
6.2. From May 26, 2014 to May 26, 2014 to the croud and shouldered froud, and E to the same year;
5. From July 1, 2014 to July 1, 2014, he/she was hospitalized in each Furine as a chest and croat for treatment until December 28, 201;
7. Until December 12, 200, the recipient was treated as outpatients in Furgical surgery.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 957,620, and KRW 160,000 from August 1, 2014 to January 20, 2015, respectively, to C for the purpose of treatment costs and agreement due to the instant traffic accident, and paid KRW 767,440 on April 22, 2015 to D, and paid KRW 489,650 on January 20, 2015 to E.
2. The plaintiff alleged that the injury suffered by C, etc. was caused by the instant traffic accident, and claimed medical expenses and the agreed amount from the defendant, and the defendant's injury suffered by C, etc. is extremely minor in the instant traffic accident.