However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 6, 2013, from around 01:09 to around 07:51 on the same day, the Defendant sent a phone at 112 from the Defendant’s home to 112 Handphones from the Defendant’s handphones, and made a false report 20 times in total, including, but not limited to, a total of 20 times, the Defendant continued to take a bath.

At around 08:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) asked at the Defendant’s house, where he received the aforementioned false report and received the said false report, to see why he was “to die with the police satisf;” and (b) assaulted twice the Defendant’s shoulder by sating the satch E in hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties for the police officer's emergency mobilization and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Materials concerning the details of 112 reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the reflection of the fact that the defendant is the defendant and there is no criminal record of suspended execution or more for the latest twenty years);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;