2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case, and his depth is divided, and that the defendant's perjury did not affect the result of the trial, and that the defendant is the most responsible for the livelihood of his wife and three children.

However, perjury requires strict punishment for a crime that obstructs the proper exercise of jurisdiction, which is the judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth, and the defendant merely instigated perjury, and made a false statement corresponding to such perjury or submitted documents containing such a false statement in the criminal trial of perjury against the victim, as well as the case where the victim voluntarily made a false testimony during his/her criminal trial of perjury against the victim, and the case where the victim was finally sentenced to imprisonment for four months with prison labor due to perjury and the case where the victim became final and conclusive by the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and criminal records, all other circumstances that are the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and criminal records, it cannot be deemed unfair

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.