except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 4, 2014, at around 01:45, the Defendant: (a) performed the D and the franchising of D operation E in Daejeon Taedong-gu, Daejeon; (b) on the ground that the victim F (hereinafter referred to as “F,” 47 years of age), who was next to him, performed the franchisation of the victim’s franchis; (c) franchising fat; and (d) fating the victim’s face at one time in drinking; (b) took a part of the victim’s face with drinking fat; (c) taken a part of the victim’s face one time in drinking fat; and (d) taken one time in drinking fat; and (d) taken one time the victim’s face, which was a dangerous object in front of the table, and took part in the victim’s face at one time; and (d) taken part in the victim’s eye therapy and the victim’s eye therapy that require one time to walk.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration, agreement, minor injury, etc.);