손해배상
1. Attached Table 3, 45, 47, 51, 71, 73, 79, 80, 87, 88, 90, 92, 93, 102, 107, 118, 121, 126, 152, 154, 161, 161.
1. ex officio determination as to the existence of the power of attorney for the institution of the instant lawsuit shall be made as to whether the attorney had the power of attorney at the time of filing the instant lawsuit.
Facts of recognition
According to the records, the following facts can be acknowledged:
1) As seen earlier in relation to B (hereinafter referred to as “B”), there was an opinion against the Defendant, such as the sentence of embezzlement, between 30 through 25, 23 through 25, 30 to 25, 23 through 25, 28 to 25, 28 to 36, 25, 28 to 25, 17, 28 to 25, 17, 28 to 36, 28 to 25, 17, 28 to 25, 17, 28 to 25, 17, 28 to 36, 25, 28 to 36, 25, 29 to 25, 106, 106, 108 to 17, 215 to 216, 17, 15, 215 to 17, 216.
3) On April 14, 2014, an attorney-at-law received the above documents and submitted the instant complaint and the letter of delegation of lawsuit to the instant court. The delegated list of the above letter of delegation of lawsuit is C and F No. 9 G and Dong name No. 9 of the Plaintiff’s list. The inner name of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s name are affixed. 4) C and F affix a seal. The written withdrawal of lawsuit to each of the instant courts on June 18, 2014 and July 7, 2014, prior to the submission of the Defendant’s written response.