A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.

B. Part 1) The second end of the judgment of the court of first instance is that “a lease contract was concluded and the non-party company received KRW 85 million from the non-party company.” 2) The third end of the judgment of the court of first instance is “monthly rent” and the second end of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The 28th day of each month.”

The third notification of repair was made in the subsection of the same paragraph, and the "(the location of the place of business under the registration certificate is the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1)" was added respectively, and the fourth "previous" in the same paragraph is the same side as "Ba".

From the end of each of the “instant cases” and the end of each of the fourths, the “instant case” and the “instant case” of the first and the sixths each of the “instant case” are considered to be the “court” respectively.

3) The following parts are added to the 3rd d. of the first d. of the judgment, the second d. of the third d. of the first d. of the judgment. [However, although the Plaintiff has made a statement to the effect that a part of the Plaintiff was delivered by enforcing a provisional execution based on the judgment of the provisional execution sentence of the first d. of the first d. of the first d. of the judgment, the validity of the claim should be determined without considering the result of execution when determining the merits in the appellate court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da3572, Sept. 8, 201) without considering the result of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da35722, Sept. 8, 201). The 3rd d. of the first d. of the first d. of the first d. of the judgment, adding “(including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)” to “the evidence evidence No. 8 and evidence No. 9” of the same.