If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On May 28, 2013, the Defendant received the written complaint against B to the Daegu Southern Police Station, and on June 27, 2013, the Defendant made a statement to supplement the written complaint at the investigation and office of the said police station.

The purpose of the complaint was that "B arbitrarily abused the seal imprint of C and prepares a notarial deed with the content that C as a debtor and B as a creditor by stealing C's seal imprint."

However, according to the fact that the defendant bears approximately KRW 86890,00 against B, it was permitted to prepare a notarial deed in which the defendant's management corporation C as the debtor is a security against the above obligation.

In this respect, the defendant did not appeal B for the purpose of having B receive criminal disposition.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning B (including the part concerning the defendant's statement);

1. Statement of the police statement of the defendant;

1. A complaint;

1. Details, notes, notices, and books of transactions;

1. A criminal investigation report (recording a record as to whether an complainant related to the preparation of a notarial deed consents);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notarial deeds (limited to a debtor as A);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 (Confession) of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.