게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendant
R Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant S shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, respectively.
Defendant .
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
R was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Act on the Sound Records, Video Products and Game Products in the Busan District Court on September 19, 2006. Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry on May 8, 2007. Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of seven hundred thousand won and confiscation for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry on August 21, 2007. Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of two million won and confiscation for the same crime in the same court on August 21, 2007, and was sentenced to a fine of two million won and confiscation for the same crime in the same court on November 17, 2015.
1. No person who is a defendant R shall engage in the business of exchanging, arranging exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water;
From July 4, 2015 to August 20, 2015, the Defendant established 35 units of “space-line game” in the game in the name of Busan-gu U and Busan-do P Gameland on the first floor. The Defendant had many unspecified customers who found the above game room input cash in the said game machine and use it in the said game machine, and had them exchange the amount after deducting 10% of the fee directly paid to customers.
As a result, the defendant carried out money exchange business through the use of game water.
2. Defendant S and Defendant B’s criminal aiding and abetting Defendant S were employed as an employee on the condition that 70,000 won per day from July 2015 to August 20, 2015 should be paid to the said game site. Defendant B served as an “marcing” under the condition that 100,000 won per day is paid in the said game site from August 15, 2015 to August 20, and Defendant B is aware that R is operating a business of money exchange by exchanging the game results except for money exchange fees to customers obtained from the head of the game, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1. However, Defendant S knew that it is operating a business of money exchange by confirming the scores of many unspecified customers of the head of the game site, cleaning and hearting the game site, and Defendant B is outside the game site.