When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant operates the “D” in Jung-Eup Si, and the victim E operates the “G” from the next F.

The Defendant sought “D” customers who visited the said store and asked “G” and asked the Defendant’s whereabouts, but the victim’s mother respondeded to the customer at a corner to the customer, and had seeed that the victim’s her mother was frighten.

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant used the “G” operated by the victim while the merchants of H market and the customers who are not aware of the name of the H market using sound facilities connected to the spacker for administrative use installed on the rooftop of the above D building, and used the “G” as “Ispurine spurine spurine spurines in the market. One house is used in Korea during the market, and the Apurine spurine spurine is being imported.

“A summary of the evidence of which the honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts”

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Application of the statutes in which the statements of witnesses E and J are stated in the second public trial protocol;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order provides that the Defendant’s business place shall be deemed to be the victim’s business place where the Defendant sent false information to the effect that one of the diversary dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and dys and

Since it is sufficient to see it, the facts charged in this case is found guilty.