The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CEX car.

On May 24, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on May 22:30, 201, and led to the flow of the four-lane road in front of the tin-wing four-lanes of the Dae-gu Dae-gu Dae-dong (Yon-dong) Dae-gu (Yon-dong) with the four-lanes of the tin-wing four-lanes in front of the Dae-gu (Yon-dong) at a don distance from the b

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to live well in the front door and drive the vehicle safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not avoid 500C Do-wing Do-wing Do-trine, which is driven by the victim D (the age of 24) who is driven by the victim D (the age of 24) on the opposite side by negligence in contravention of the signal, and received the front part of the above Oral Do-trine as the right side of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment from the victim due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident report (1, 2), photographs of the scene of the accident, and a medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Agency for Verifying subscription to comprehensive motor vehicle insurance;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the following reasons: Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts; Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Depository) is a primary and reflective offense; Article 268 of the Criminal Act; Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; Article 268