However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On 23:10 on 21. 21. 21. 23:10 on 201. 23:23:10, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the fourth floor of the Pyeongtaek-si building that “the breast spath spath,” and assaulted the Defendant to prevent the Defendant from doing so by affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station C police box, which called “it is unnecessary for the police officer,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify departments related to 112 Incident Report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] / The crime of obstruction of official duties is likely to undermine the authority of the public authority and impede the establishment of legal order. However, although the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant seems to have committed a contingency crime by drinking, and the degree of obstruction of official duties is somewhat minor, and other circumstances shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc. are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition.