If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

around 18:20 on December 3, 2018, the Defendant entered the 'Diplomatic Association' managed by the victim C, which was a father and a son in the Gu Government-si B, and intruded on the above structure.

The Defendant stated in the indictment around 19:06 on December 28, 2018, “Around 06:20 on December 7, 2018” is obvious that the Defendant is a clerical error. As such, the Defendant does not have any substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s defense, it is immediately grounded ex officio.

The ‘I convenience point managed by F, the victim F, the victim in E, in the indictment of the G convenience store managed by F, the victim in E, is a clerical error. Since it is obvious that the ‘I convenience point' managed by F, the victim in H, is a clerical error, it is correct ex officio because it does not give any substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense.

In the case of the victim, the victim stated that "I am different from 1 A of the tobacco to be done."

The Defendant: (a) committed a theft by having a small 2 soldier’s disease in the air conditioners and having a half of the disease; and (b) having a 8,300 won of the market price between the victim and the victim, who reported on the 112 report, the Defendant: (c) committed a theft by having a small 2 soldier’s disease in the aggregate amount of KRW 8,300 of the market price; and (d) having a cigarette 1 A.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 5392"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. 112 Reporting Table "2019 High-class 191";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation (the eight pages of investigation records);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Receipts:

1. Records of 112 reported cases;

1. Application of on-site CCTV CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act lies in the defendant's attitude against his or her wrong judgment.

The crime of this case was committed.