2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. From August 2006 to September 2009, Plaintiff A served as the Defendant’s leader from around September 2009, and Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a non-corporate association composed of residents who live in the fishing industry from South-west Sea D members.

B. On March 17, 2009, Plaintiff A, who was a member of the Defendant’s fraternity, purchased and transported 32,000 won (32,000 won) and received 300,000 won (30,000 won) from the Defendant. On March 24, 2009, Plaintiff A received 12,000,000 won (12,000,000 won) from the Defendant, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 9503, Apr. 10, 2009; Act No. 9503, Apr. 10, 2009>

C. However, from Apr. 11, 2009 to Apr. 13, 2009, E purchased 1,067 net 15,500,000 won and supplied them to the Defendant. Plaintiff A conspired to make the quantity of the paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper paper.

Plaintiff

A knew on April 21, 2009 that the paper plaque purchased by E is merely 1,067 net yarns, but the Defendant submitted to the public official in charge the related documents, such as a tax invoice stating as if the Defendant purchased from F the paper tag 1,570 net yarns in KRW 54,950,000, and received KRW 24,00,000 of the local subsidy related to the paper tag project from South Sea to the Defendant’s account.

E. The plaintiff A is above C.

subsections and d.

On February 23, 2011, a public prosecution was instituted due to the facts of the crime, such as the same crime, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in October as the Changwon District Court's Jinwon Branch 2010dan467, 698, 1103, and 1561 (merger). The appeal was filed on June 9, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of ten million won as the Changwon District Court 201No621, Jun. 9, 201, and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

(hereinafter “First Criminal Trial of this case”)

F. In addition, the Plaintiff A shall take May 2007 and March 2009.