사기
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
"200 Highest 726"
1. The Defendant, around February 7, 2020, posted a false statement on the part of the victim B to the effect that “the victim B purchases opphone6,” and the victim B purchased opphone6,” and concluded that “the Defendant would deliver opphone6 to opphone6 on a door-to-door basis if deposited 60,000 won.”
However, since the defendant did not have opphone6, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell opphone6.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 60,000 won from the victim to the E-bank account in the name of the Defendant.
2. Around March 14, 2020, the Defendant reported a false statement to the effect that the victim F purchased beer pro-North Korea at the above place, and that the victim F posted a false statement to the effect that the victim F purchased beer pro-North Korea, and that the victim deposited KRW 600,000 with the Defendant’s Mes and Mes and Mes and Mes and the Defendant would deliver beer pro-North Korea to the Defendant.”
However, since the defendant did not have Macbuk, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell Macbuk.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 50,00 from the victim, and KRW 50,000 on March 15, 2020 from the victim, respectively, to the E-bank account in the name of the Defendant.
As a result, the defendant deceivings the victims on two occasions in order to acquire property by deceit.
"200 Highest 727"
1. On December 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the victim G by asking a phone at a place where it is impossible to identify a place below Gangwon-do (hereinafter referred to as “the victim G”) in early 2019,000 won or less, and thereby, he/she would pay 3,300,000 won with interest after one month.”
However, in fact, the defendant was punished for a part-time or daily work during university vacations in addition to the income.