성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 120 hours.
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 30, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use and photographing of Cameras, etc.) by photographing, in AC located in Mameras AB, taken the victim’s legs using mobile phones with carmeras, and taken the victim’s legs by taking advantage of the mobile phones. From around that time to January 1, 2018, the Defendant taken photographs of the victims over 25 times in total, such as in the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 25 times.
Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of another person who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a mechanical device with a camera function against his will.
2. On November 18, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter of “F” on the part of the Defendant’s residence located in CDMos on the part of the Defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras, etc.) by exchanging illegally videos, at the place of residence of the Defendant located in CDMos, and on AD (E), an overseas Internet site.
After that, the Defendant received a photograph from a name influor who reported and contacted with the Defendant, and sent 18 copies of “the photograph taken by a female on a female bridge from the sales store for office supplies” to the above name influor via AE Messen.
In addition, from around that time to August 11, 2018, the Defendant used the foregoing method in the name of the above Defendant, 129, 132, 134, 138, 137, 135, 142, 143, 144, 156 and 152, 154, 155 and 158, 156, 159, 153 and 160, 153 and 160, among the photographs sent by the Defendant to H, as shown in the attached list of crimes (2), appears to be the same file.
However, if the transmission of the above photographs were individually restored, and the number of the hosting room is different, the defendant appears to have sent each file to H two times, and the same act is charged repeatedly.