However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 29, 2016, at around 09:20 on May 29, 2016, the Defendant driven a Bhurd-Wed-to-Wed-Wed-to-Wed-Wed-Wed-Jed-to-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-

The driver of a motor vehicle neglected to perform his/her duty of care to drive the motor vehicle on an expressway as well as to drive the motor vehicle according to the normal driving direction, but the defendant neglected to drive the said expressway on the expressway with Uton in the above direction, leading up to a speed of about 70 km in the speed of about a speed of about 70 km in Seoul, along the two-lanes in the direction of Seoul. Such occupational negligence led to a point at a point at which 326.5 km in Seoul, which is driven by the victim C, driving the motor vehicle in the front direction of the above motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the course of performing such duties, injury to the victim E of the victim of the victimized vehicle, such as a satisfying frying, etc., which requires approximately 4 weeks of treatment, and injury, such as a right dufing duf, etc., for approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each traffic accident report;

1. Related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of five copies of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflects on his status, the fact that the defendant's driver's vehicle is expected to have been covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and that considerable part of damage would have been recovered, and that the defendant

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;