When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 22:30 on July 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as spiting off the face of the above E on one occasion, spiting off the buck, walking down the bucks on the hand floor of the above F on one occasion; and (b) continuously spiting down the bucks on the hand floor of the F on one occasion; and (c) spiting the spits of the sprink, walking down the sprink on one occasion, walkinging the sprink, walkinging the sprink, walkinging the sprink, walkinging the sprink on the hand floor of the F on one occasion.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and of violence photo;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment imposed on police officers F with heavier concurrent crimes shall be imposed);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the following factors shall be comprehensively taken into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, growth process, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol by assaulting the police officers who handle the 112 reported case against the Defendant, and its nature is poor in light of the form of crime.

The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties, like this case, needs to be punished strictly in order to eradicate the state's awareness of public power and to establish the state's legal order.

The defendant did not reach an agreement with the victimized police officers.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant seems to have a view to recognizing and opposing the crime.

In the state of being taken by the defendant.