A. The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (seven years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. The judgment that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and divided it, and that one of the victims and the agreed points is favorable.

On the other hand, the fact that the amount acquired by the defendant and the number of victims is very high, that most of the victims' damages have not been recovered, and that many victims want to be punished against the defendant up to the trial.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing indicated in the instant case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.