However, for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on July 7, 1998. A

On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant sent to the B and once sexual intercourse in the non-permanent mine E-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, with the date of lower order.

B. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant, who was sexual intercourses with B and once at the same place where the date was in the first order.

C. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant, who was sexual intercourses B and once with B at the same place where the date was in order. D.

On January 1, 2014, the Defendant sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourses B and once at the same place as the first day in the same order.

E. On January 201, 2014, the Defendant sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourses B and once at the same place as the date in which the date was in order.

F. On February 2014, the Defendant sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourses B and once at the same place as on the first and second day.

G. On March 2014, the Defendant sent to the same place as B and once, in which the date was in order and in which the date was in order.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at each time, place specified in paragraph (1) was sexual intercourses with A and seven times, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Report on investigation (related to attachment of a certificate of divorce receipt and an explanatory note), - A certificate of divorce receipt;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as marriage relation certificate;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. The Defendants subject to suspended execution: (a) the Defendants were divided into each of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and are against each of them; (b) Defendant A did not have any specific criminal power other than twice before and after the fine of this kind; and (c) Defendant B did not have any criminal power; and (d) the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the text