beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단2001

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 2001"

1. On March 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B, a victim B, who was in the north-gu Busan Metropolitan City C Apartment 101 Dong 202 on March 201, 201, stating, “If 15 million won is invested, she will accept the game room of D operation and pay 2.5% interest with the proceeds from the operation of the game room.”

However, the defendant did not have a specific plan to accept the game room of D operation and even if he received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to receive the game room and deliver the proceeds to the victim.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 15 million from the victim under the pretext of investment around March 15, 2010.

2. The Defendant, as an insurance solicitor, was paying off the Defendant’s non-dividend Samsung Group Insurance (Insurance Number) in the name of the victim, and the father of the victim knew that the victim did not know that the victim had subscribed to the insurance policy, such as non-dividend Samsung Fire Insurance Number B (Insurance Number) as the insured, etc., by deceiving the victim that he/she would take up the insurance he/she paid to the victim, and had his/her father take advantage of the fact that the victim was unaware of the fact that he/she did not know that he/she had subscribed to the insurance policy, he/she was waiting for taking out the insurance policy he/she paid to the victim, and after having obtained the victim’s consent,

On July 13, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the I office located in Busan Dong-gu H, Busan, stating that “The Defendant consented to withdrawal of the victim’s insurance in the name of the victim who had been making a large payment so far.”

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and requiring the victim to consent to the withdrawal from the insurance intermediate insurance, shall be attached from that day to December 27, 2012, including that the father of the victim was paid 6,70,000 won from that time to that of the victim with respect to the above insurance he/she bought for the victim.