beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.12.27 2016고단1372

도로교통법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:30 on June 27, 2016, the Defendant driving a DNA car while under the influence of alcohol with 0.292% of the blood alcohol concentration, without a vehicle driver’s license, and driving a DNA car while under the influence of alcohol with 0.292% of the blood alcohol concentration, from the 700-meter section to the “C” parking lot located in the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a DNA car.

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on June 22:30, and continued the front way of the restaurant called the “C” located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan City.

At the time, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle, as the Defendant had been parked in the street parking lot at that time. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, received the part on the left-hand side of the said car of the Victim E, which was parked on the left-hand side of the running direction of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the repair cost equivalent to KRW 611,356, such as the exchange of the above rocketing car in front of the said car by occupational negligence.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) above, driven the above DKan Corpon which was not covered by mandatory insurance in the same manner as stated in Paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a report on actual condition;

1. Written estimate;