2. The Defendant’s previous convictions of the violation of the Road Traffic Act reached eight times, and among them, even if the previous convictions were not less than twice but not less than twice but the previous convictions were repeated in that they committed the instant crime. In light of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.