beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.15 2015고단2932

모해위증

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant worked as the representative director of C from September 2005. Since around 2000, C purchased an exclusive card terminal for purchase of alcoholic beverages from D, a mail order agent of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. from around 200 to supply alcoholic beverages without compensation, and operated the business of receiving commission for the settlement of alcoholic beverages from each seller. On August 2005, D Co., Ltd. directly becomes a mail order agent of SK Telecom, and received a short term payment, recruitment commission, etc. from SK Telecom, but it was difficult to enter into a contract of SK Telecom and mail order agent due to the financial standing of C Co., Ltd., but it was a vice-chairperson of C Co.

E Co., Ltd. entered into a contract for SK Telecom and mail order agency in the name of F.

Afterwards, the above E transfers only part of the money deposited from the SK Telecom to the account of C, and the Defendant filed a complaint with the above E to the effect that the entire amount paid from the SK Telecom is not deposited. On May 22, 2013, the above E was prosecuted for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) to the Do Government District Court on May 22, 2013.

In addition, on August 23, 2013, around 15:30, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the offense of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) against the above court No. 2013 Gohap 185 E in the court No. 2013, Jin-gu District Court No. 234 Dao-ro No. 3434, Jin-si. Do.

When the Defendant pays to C all the opening subsidies, management fees, and incentives received from SK Telecom as a witness’s assertion, the Defendant, thereby, required to bear the burden of the Defendant, such as additional value taxes, corporate tax, etc. to be paid by F, a business operator.

“There was no special arrangement for the question “”.

“At the time of testimony,” and the counsel.