If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 19:00 on October 5, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was unable to drink boomed at the house” at the D cafeteria operated by the Victim C located in Busan Metropolitan City, which reads that “The Defendant will pay monthly pay to the company, if he was to receive monthly pay in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.8 million, and if he was to provide food on credit, he would pay monthly pay to the company.”

However, in fact, the Defendant received monthly wage of 1.50 to 1.6 million won at the time, but her mother gave 1.30-1.4 million won to her mother’s average daily living cost in supporting her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received food equivalent to KRW 101,50 from the victim, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

In addition, from around that time to September 25, 2013, the Defendant received food equivalent to KRW 6,307,500 in total by the same method over 132 occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Table, and did not pay the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data submitted, such as a complaint, copy of books, investigation report (verification of the payment of credit on the counter party, submission of data, and written statements) external account books

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;