근로기준법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., in Scheon-si B, who runs the electronic components manufacturing business using five regular workers.
The defendant in the foregoing workplace, from March 25, 2013 to the same year.
8. 31. Work experience for the same year;
9. 1. The retirement worker D’s wages of KRW 5,00,00,00 for April 2013, the monthly wage of KRW 5,000,000 for May, the monthly wage of KRW 5,000,000 for June, the monthly wage of KRW 5,000,00 for July, and KRW 25,000 for August’s wage of KRW 5,000 for August, and KRW 25,000 for the monthly wage of KRW 25,00,000 for the due date without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date for payment.
2. We examine the judgment, which is a case in which a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim's explicit intent pursuant to Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act. According to the records of this case, it is recognized that a worker D withdraws his wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.