When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who works as “B”.

The Defendant Company set up a banner on the D apartment complex, which is adjacent to the construction site, “in the process of the process of the appointment of an attorney-at-law under the jurisdiction of the court” and “ex officio revocation and stay beyond the slope” in the pent of D apartment complex, and considered that the sale of the land in progress in the Defendant Company would not be smooth and free to remove the banner from it;

1. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on May 20, 2016, removed a banner equivalent to approximately KRW 90,000 established by the D Apartment Management Office E (the age of 43, South) on the iron pents of the apartment 102-dong apartment on the road, and discarded it into a waste storage place, thereby impairing the utility of property.

2. On June 18, 2016, around 09:57, the Defendant removed a banner equivalent to approximately 65,000 won which is set up in the place under paragraph (1) of the said Article, thereby impairing the utility of property by dumping it into the waste storage place;

3. At around 14:50 on June 30, 2016, the Defendant removed three banners equivalent to KRW 160,000, which were installed at the place under the foregoing paragraph (1) from the place of waste storage, thereby impairing the utility of property by dumping it into the waste storage place;

4. At around 09:30 on July 1, 2016 - around 09:50, the Defendant: (a) removed two banners equivalent to KRW 70,000 at the market price set up at the place under the foregoing paragraph (1) in order to improve the utility of the property by dumping it into the waste site; and (b) destroyed seven banners equivalent to KRW 385,000 on a total of four occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of a damaged banner;

1. Documents to be submitted by the victim;

1. The defendant submitted to the victim (a copy of the receipt). The defendant suffered enormous damage due to a banner without any ground attached to the defendant's company's land developed before the land, and the defendant recommended the competent authorities to remove the illegal attachment.