A. The passage of the development-restricted zone No. B 1) The Sungnam-si took the relocation of the office building as a lodging business in order to minimize the inconvenience of the residents of new cities, while the viewing company was old and narrow, and became the Defendant on October 1, 2009 by combining the Korea Land Corporation (Korea Land Corporation, 1, 2009).

In this chapter, only “Defendant” in total shall be deemed to be “Defendant” before and after the merger.

) In order to reflect such administrative demand and to meet the government policies, regions, such as C, D, E, E, and Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, the Fil-si, Sungnam-si, 90,00 square meters in size 90,000 square meters (hereinafter “instant B”) between Sungnam-si and Sungnam-si, 204;

Since then, the area was reduced to 894,000 square meters as the planned area of the national rental housing complex.

(2) The Ministry of Construction and Transportation amended on October 9, 2003, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation guidelines for formulating an urban management plan (hereinafter “instant development guidelines”) to cancel development restriction zones, such as collective settlement, etc. (hereinafter “the development restriction guidelines in this case”) includes a content that expands the scope of preferential cancellation of development restriction zones to early resolve the inconvenience of residents in relation to the development restriction of collective settlement areas, etc.

Accordingly, the collective settlement in the instant case fell under the area subject to prior cancellation of development restriction zones, but the said area was promoted simultaneously with the designation of the area subject to national rental housing complex and the cancellation of development restriction zones, and the procedure for prior cancellation of development restriction zones was not implemented separately.

3. On January 20, 2006, Sungnam-si designated the instant B as a planned area for the national rental housing complex and then can be compensated on the premise that the land is the preferentially cancelled area when compensating for the land.