If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is in office and is a person who resides in the same building as the victim C (47 tax, South Korea).

around 22:00 on August 12, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant was the victim on his own day based on the owner of the building in front of the building in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building, and was committing a special assault, such as “The Defendant was fluoring off two times in the item damaged by the length of about 15 cm, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that he was the victim on his own day, “..........”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order did not call the knife knife on the victim at the time of committing the instant crime

One of the arguments is that the victim has accumulated the knife in the victim's item in this court.

In light of the fact that the above statements are the same as the contents of the statements made by specific investigation agencies and there is no other circumstance to regard them as false, the above assertion by the defendant and the defense counsel is without merit.

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, including the following: the reason for sentencing of this case; the background of this case; the method of the crime of this case was dangerous; the fact that the defendant and the victim agreed smoothly between the defendant and the victim; the defendant has no record of crime; and the defendant has no record of crime.