국가유공자비해당결정처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition of refusal to render distinguished services to the State against the Plaintiff on January 8, 2019 shall be revoked.
2...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 12, 1964, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was appointed as Staff sergeant on November 1, 1966. From March 10, 1970 to February 20, 1971, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 31, 1972.
B. The Plaintiff asserted that, during the Vietnam War’s period, while working in the equipment of the water team, the power generator was repaired in the water team to repair the power generator of the water team, while serving in the equipment of the water team, and was wounded on the part of the water team, the Plaintiff suffered from the accident. On July 11, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground of its application for inspection and suspension (hereinafter “instant wounds”).
C. On December 19, 1975, the Board of Patriots and Veterans resolved that the Plaintiff does not constitute the requirements of persons who were killed or wounded in action, soldier or policeman wounded in action, soldier or policeman wounded in action, and soldier or policeman wounded in action, and soldier or policeman wounded in action, respectively, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have the record of hospitalization at a military hospital, and that the record of medical care, such as the beds, which can prove the details of injury and injury, is not confirmed, and that 10 finger fingerprintss are fully verified in the first application for issuance of
On January 8, 2019, the defendant notified the plaintiff of a decision that he/she does not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran's compensation.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.
Therefore, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant on January 17, 2019, but the result of review by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement was the same as the result of the previous review, and the decision was rendered on April 29, 2019.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 8 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was based on the same reasons as the grounds for applying for a distinguished service to the State, and thus, on a different premise.