When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant was a person who served as a member of C Co., Ltd., a competing company of the victim B.

On March 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed in the Internet website E press for the purpose of slandering the victim at the C office located in Bocheon-si, Mana City, 14 March 14, 2016, and (b) placed “F” on the article “F” in which the Defendant tried to place a company to be tried for the production and sale of defective aggregate, as the gue gue, collected with excreta, and as such, immediately tried to place the company

B. French Republic of Korea

(2) If there are two companies,

After the cancellation of KS, B supplied B with B with B 5,033 Ved B containing comments on the comments “I cannot see why he was unable to be examined.” The message made public through information and communications networks, thereby impairing the honor of other persons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A complaint, news articles, and the closure photographs of comments;

1. Response to a request for verification of the revocation of the certification of KS;

1. Application of statutes governing summary orders (No. 3227) to the Daejeon District Court's Hongsung Branch Branch Court of about 2015 high priority order;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime, as well as Article 70 of the relevant Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on March 14, 2016 is solely related to the public interest and that there is no purpose of defamation.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is difficult to view the defendant's major motive or purpose as being for the public interest, and there is a purpose to slander the competitor.

Recognized.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

① When the investigation of J was initiated with respect to the new construction site around February 2014 by the Hanam National Police Agency and the investigation was long-term, the E press H reporters of the E press will be an article as “K” on June 29, 2015, and on October 5, 2015, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 13283, Oct. 5, 2015>