A. In order to escape from the situation where a certain degree of money cannot be hidden by a victim, the Defendant merely felbling the victim’s timber in a timely manner, and did not assault the victim’s timber by skeing the victim’s timber.

B. The above act of the defendant constitutes self-defense.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following facts admitted by the lower court as to the mistake of facts and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the lower court, the Defendant’s use of the victim’s booms and assaulted the victim.

1) The victim stated in the investigative agency (the first police investigation and investigation record No. 7 pages) and the court of the court below that "the defendant made a talk that he was aware of the fact that he was satisfing and satisfing his body while satisfing with his own denial and wind." The victim suffered bodily injury in the process of fighting at the time, and the defendant's act seems to have suffered such injury and made a statement at the investigative agency (the 4,47 pages of the investigation record), ② the victim's accusation circumstance, and the statement attitude at the investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below cannot be deemed to have made a false statement until the victim took charge of the punishment for satisfy, it is recognized that credibility of the victim's statement is recognized. ① The victim's act of assault at the time of assault and physical force against the person's body is an act of assault and assault against the victim's spouse (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Do4268, Jul. 24, 2008).