2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that if the detention of the Defendant is prolonged, it might be difficult to support the aged mother's mother.

However, the crime of this case is very serious that the defendant driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.252%, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had been sentenced to imprisonment four times with prison labor for the same kind of criminal records in the past; the defendant does not seem to have an imminent or inevitable circumstance that the defendant should drive in the state of drinking at the time of the crime of this case; and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, are considered unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.