If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 18, 2019, at around 21:58, the Defendant was found to be a police box located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant expressed a complaint regarding the receipt of a summary judgment request with respect to a false report at least 30 minutes prior to the issuance of the summary judgment request, and used the water contained in P and E, a police officer belonging to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of internal order in the police box.

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each investigation report (STV image verification and summary trial related), photographs to capture CCTV images, traffic boxes, and public official identification cards (E and D) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the fact that the defendant is led to confession, his age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc.