If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On December 15, 2009, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On May 17, 2010, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 2 million by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On October 29, 2013, at around 23:47, the Defendant driven a sobatory parking lot located in the upper right of the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, with approximately 5km alcohol concentration of about 0.110% from the section of about 5km up to the point of 0.110% of the blood alcohol content, at a sobatory parking lot located in the same satory of the same saves apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of a host driver, and report on the status of a host driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: References to criminal records and investigation reports (a copy of a summary order attached) shall be applied by statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the same criminal record, and the crime of this case is committed during the period of probation due to fraud, and it is inevitable to sentence heavy punishment in that it causes an accident that causes damage to parked vehicles.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant's mistake is pened in depth and does not drive under the influence of alcohol, and the circumstances where the defendant disposed of the vehicle of this case can be seen, a fine shall be selected and the punishment as ordered shall be determined.