2. The defendants are above.

1. Defendant A

A. On June 18, 2015, at around 09:00, Defendant A listened to the victim G G (43) who is located in the south Qyang-gun F, both of which are located in the middle of 09:00, that is, the victim G would not be able to get out of the victim G, and the victim G would be able to get out of the dub between the dub between the dubs and the dubs, and the dubs and mils

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted Victim G.

B. On June 4, 2015, at around 09:30 on June 4, 2015, Defendant A, as a matter of cutting down the ridge between the Duals of G located in G in the Dualyang-gun F, Defendant A left a bridge of Defendant B (78 years old), who was a meal next to that of Defendant B (78 years old) who was living in a bridged with the Duals of the Duals of G, and pushed down the part attached to Defendant B.

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted Defendant B.

2. Defendant B, at around 09:30 on June 4, 2015, 2015, she saw Defendant B to reduce the sway between the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Duals and the Du

Accordingly, Defendant B assaulted Defendant A.

3. On June 4, 2015, at around 09:30 on June 4, 2015, Defendant C, as set forth in paragraph 2, she either pushed the Defendant A, who is the husband of this case, and she pushed the Defendant A’s head. Defendant C her head was shakend.

Accordingly, Defendant C assaulted Defendant A.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1] Among Defendant A’s legal statement, the following facts are denied: (a) the witness G, B, and C’s photographs related to each legal statement (the Defendant A did not commit assault to the victim G and Defendant B) to the effect that he/she spawn the discussed water on June 18, 2015 and that he/she was spawning a spawn with a spawn and spawn with a spawn with a spawn.

However, according to each of the above evidence, such as witness G, B, and C’s testimony duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim is a victim as stated in the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant A.