beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.11.10 2016고정98

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who had been working to attract Internet subscription goods by means of business, such as soliciting telephone sales, etc.

In spite of the fact that the personal information has been leaked, no person was provided with the personal information for profit or for an illegal purpose, the defendant was aware of the sales of the attracting customer's personal information acquired by hackinging the site of another domestic Internet customer attraction company through the "Ntttotoon account" through the "C (tentative name, poor name) team leader who performed the same work at the time, and the defendant was able to use the personal information database files illegally acquired from them for the business of attracting customers.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) purchased a personal information database file for 5,000 persons from the office of the first floor of the E-Japan general housing from the Defendant’s name at the office of the first floor; (b) paid KRW 200,000 as the price for the purchase of the database file for 5,000 persons in the name of the Defendant; and (c) purchased the said database file for 5,000 persons in the same place at the same time at the same time, and paid KRW 20,000,000 in the aggregate to the Korean bank (J) in the same manner on March 2, 2015; and (d) purchased the said database file for 6,000 persons in the same manner at the same place; and (e) paid KRW 60,000 in the name of the Korean bank; and (e) paid KRW 600,000 in the same amount to 10,000 in the name of the Korean bank.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired personal information divulged by illegal means or methods for the purpose of profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Domestic internal investigation reports (other accounts, etc. of personal information distributors), internal investigation reports (in the analysis of four advertising notes for sales of personal information DV), internal investigation reports (in the analysis of account response data for “Netro” added to suspected users), and