1. The Defendant, on August 27, 2013, entered the Republic of Korea around August 27, 2013, is a Chinese exchange student living in the office AF of the E University Dormitory F of the E University Building A 601, Dong 601.

The Defendant divided her mother and child and prepared a room to transport stolen goods in advance so that the face of CCTV is not taken, and the Defendant attempted to steals, cellular phone devices, cash, etc. by entering the dormitory of E University where the Defendant lives and the dormitory of H University located in G in G in the neighboring Asan City and entering the dormitory, etc. in a way that the students living in the dormitory are unfolded.

On September 24, 2013, at around 10:39, the Defendant entered the I building, a dormitory of H University, from that time to November 05 of the same day, and entered the I building 210, which had been living by the victimJ, and entered as a cret and stolen the I building from that time, from that time to that time, the Defendant used the cret of the I building 210, which had been living by the victimJ, and used the cret to prepare for the victim’s market value of KRW 1.5 million, the amount of KRW 7,00,000, in advance,

In addition, the Defendant habitually stolen another person’s property over 21 times from September 4, 2013 to September 24 of the same month, as indicated in [Attachment Table 1, 9, 12 to 19, 21 to 31 in the status of insufficient decision-making capacity due to shock disorder.

2. On May 6, 2014, the Defendant, around 20:20 on May 6, 2014, at the second floor of the clothing store operated by the victim L (53 years of age) located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, put in and steals the Defendant’s home room at the victim’s seat by taking advantage of the gaps of the victim’s surveillance, put in the 3.90,00 won of the market value of the victim’s possession, and added it to the victim who discovered it through CCTV in the store and discovered it through CCTV in the store, and sustained the victim’s injury of the victim’s coke for the purpose of evading arrest.

Accordingly, the defendant has weak ability to make decisions due to shock disorder.