However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 2015, the Defendant: (a) when the front number plate was attached to the registration number plate of a vehicle for Poter vehicle C due to tax delinquency, etc. in front B in front of the Sinung-si, B, and due to tax delinquency, the Defendant forged a car registration number plate, which is the mark of a public office, by putting the front number plate of the said vehicle on the front number plate without authority and writing “D” in a white paint, for the purpose of uttering.

2. From July 2015 to March 23, 2016, the Defendant used a forged motor vehicle registration number plate, as prescribed in paragraph 1, to attach it to the front part of paragraph 1.

3. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall use a forged or forged motor vehicle registration number plate;

Nevertheless, the defendant forged a car registration number plate as in paragraph 1, and used a forged car registration number plate as in paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on internal accidents and descriptions of the comprehensive particulars of the vehicle;

1. Application of image Acts and subordinate statutes of vehicle photographs;

1. Article 238 (1) (the point of Article 238 of the Criminal Act), Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) (the point of exercising forged air defense) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 78 subparagraph 2 and 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act (the point of using a forged registration number plate and a forged registration number plate);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the recognition of all crimes and reflects mistake, and the absence of criminal records other than the records of identical punishment and fines);