2...

A. On July 22, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the network D and Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government EF, setting the lease deposit of KRW 75,000,000, the lease term from September 24, 2014 to September 23, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and paid the lease deposit.

B. The deceased died on December 9, 2015, and at the time, wife G and Ha were the inheritor, but H was the inheritor, and on May 27, 2016, H became the deceased’s mother, the Defendant, who was the deceased, according to the Seoul Family Court 2016 Ga-Ma1837, followed by the adjudication on renunciation of inheritance.

C. After September 6, 2017, the Defendant was rendered a judgment with the Seoul Family Court Decision 2017 Madan2187, which was inherited by the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above findings of the determination on the cause of the claim, since the lease contract of this case was terminated upon the expiration of the period, the defendant is obligated to return 30,000,000 won out of the lease deposit (75,00,000 won of the lease deposit x 2/5 shares) to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable.