However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:45, 2017, on the ground that the victim C (59 years of age) was prevented from smoking tobacco within the pertinent D shop from the victim’s frontway operated by the victim C (59 years of age) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) was destroyed by the victim and the Si expenses; and (c) when the victim’s face, who wear a drinking breath, was 180,000 won away from the floor, the market price was 180,000 won.

As a result, the defendant added the victim's property to the left side of the snow where the number of days of treatment can not be known, and at the same time damaged the victim's property.

『2017 고단 551』 피고인은 2017. 2. 6. 09:05 경 서울 영등포구 E에 있는 피해자 F이 운영하는 ‘G’ 식당에서 술에 취하여 식당 내에 있던 성명 불상의 손님 3명에게 “ 짱 개 새끼들, 다 죽여 버려야 한다.

“Along with the desire of the said customers, the said customers continued to have the defect about to go in the restaurant, and the said customers continued to be able to go to the restaurant, and the said customers were able to go to the restaurant by hand, and the said customers continued to go to the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 525"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A damaged photograph of 2017 Mano 525;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to 112 reporting of the case;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (the point of harm), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to the crimes of injury and damage to property);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to ten years; and

2. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Interference with the business (a).