A. The plaintiff and the defendants share the real estate stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article in the same share as that stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article.

B. There is no special agreement prohibiting partition of co-owned property between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, but no agreement has been reached among the above co-owners.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the premise of the claim for partition of co-owned property as to the real estate as stated in the Disposition Paragraph (1) is recognized to have been fully satisfied. Since it is deemed that it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the real estate in kind in light of the nature, location, size, use situation, use value after the partition, etc. of the co-owned property, real estate shall

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.