A. Article 32(1)2 of the Act on the Promotion of misunderstanding of Facts provides that “game products different from the rated contents” shall be different from the rated contents in the Game Rating Board’s game operation method, game screen, and method of obtaining points, and it does not necessarily require the change of game files.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that the game game files submitted at the time of deliberation to the Game Rating Board and the files extracted from the term of office deemed to be the same, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendants (Defendant A: 3 years of suspended execution, confiscation, community service, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for October 10, 3 years of suspended execution, 3 years of suspended execution, community service, etc.) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

(a) No person charged with this part of the facts constituting an offense shall distribute, provide for use, exhibit or keep game products of the contents different from the classified game products;

피고인들은 공모하여, 2011. 8.중순경부터 2011. 9. 5.경까지 사이에 인천 남구 E게임랜드에서, 등급분류를 받은 내용과 달리 이용자는 제시되는 3개의 그림 중 다른 1개의 그림을 선택하여 미션을 성공하여야 하나 ‘시작’, ‘선택1’, ‘선택2’, ‘선택3’ 버튼을 동시에 지속적으로 누르게 되면 이용자 선택에 의한 결정이 아닌 프로그램에 의해 3개 중의 1개가 임의적 선택이 되는 상태로 진행되고, 이용자가 주어진 미션에 대한 정답을 선택했음에도 불구하고, 정답 ‘ ’ 표시와 점수 획득 없이 게임이 종료되고, 이용자가 주어진 미션에 대한 오답을 선택했음에도 불구하고, 오답 ‘X' 표시없이 게임이 종료되고, 자동으로 버튼을 누르는 장치(속칭 ’똑딱이‘)를 설치하여...