When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant reported the marriage on September 2, 2015 with the victim B.

1. From October 10, 2015 to 05:00 on October 10, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement on the victim’s body from 101 Dong 1503, Namnam-gun C 101 to 1503, which had been moving to another male, thereby making it difficult for the victim to know the number of days of treatment.

2. On November 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on November 22, 2015, at the Daejeon Daejeon Daejeon Wed-Seman (Seoul), got the victim to talk with the victim; and (b) went to Seoul to move the victim to Seoul; and (c) was on the part of the vehicle driven by the victim and was on the part of the victim; and (d) the Defendant was on the part of the driver.

Around 03:00 on November 23, 2015, the Defendant stated that “the victim ought to go to Daejeon, she would get off, and, if not, she would go to his/her own seat.” On the ground that the victim said that “I would go to Daejeon, I would go to Daejeon”, the Defendant saw that I would turn to the front seat of the victim who was seated, and that I would turn to the back seat, and then, I am to the front part of the victim’s inside and after the back seat, and then, I am to the front part of the victim who could not know the number of days of treatment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damage situations;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a person injured by reason of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not want the punishment of the defendant at all, and the defendant is seeking a prior action shall be determined as the same as the order.