2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the finding of conviction ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to the judge to have the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to the prosecutor’s conviction, the determination ought to be made in the interest of the defendant even if he/she was suspected of guilt (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do15767, Feb. 13, 2014). The fact that the defendant was driven by the victim and the driver of the sexton vehicle immediately before the collision with the vehicle

In the instant case recognized by the Defendant, whether the Defendant’s act of taking the aforementioned Bracks resulted from the Defendant’s intentional act of assaulting the victim. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor in a consistent manner, the mere evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone proves that the Defendant’s intentional act of assault was proven without any reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see it.

가. 충돌 직전의 피고인과 피해자의 행위 위 증거에 의하면 피고인은 피해 차량 앞으로 끼어들기를 하면서 미안 하다는 표시로 비상등을 깜박인 사실을 인정할 수 있고, 피해자는 항의의 표시로 경적을 울리고 톨게이트 방향으로 좌회전을 마친 후 피고인이 운전한 차량을 향해 상향 등을 켠 사실을 인정할 수 있다....