국가유공자및보훈보상대상자요건비해당결정처분취소
1. The decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on March 21, 2016 revoked as non-conformity of the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation.
2...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 26, 2011, the Plaintiff (B) entered the Army and enlisted in a new path training center, and was on the same year.
8. 5. After the discharge on April 1, 2014, the person was discharged from military service on March 27, 2015, on the part of the first group of the third group of the first group of the second group of the first group of the second group of the second group of the second group of the second group of the second group of the third group of the second group of the second group of
B. On May 19, 2015, the Plaintiff was deprived of both sides while serving in the military.
Although the Defendant filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State on March 21, 2016 by asserting that “the head of a Si/Gun/Gu” was “the head of a Si/Gun/Gu,” and applying for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “instant wounds”), it is difficult to recognize that the head of a Si/Gun/Gu rapidly aggravated because the head of a Si/Gun/Gu was found to have been judged as a Si/Gun/Gu, and the head of the
For reasons such as ‘A person who rendered distinguished services to the State' and ‘A person eligible for veteran's compensation.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 8 and 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not seem to have been treated as a shoulder-out tool of the army entrance. After entering the Army on July 26, 201, the Plaintiff received basic education and training at the 37th S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. on the 27th of the same month following the following day, the Plaintiff was ordered to return home on the 29th of the same month after an interview with the military doctor on the 28th of the same month.
On April 1, 2014, after completing the education and training for new soldiers, the Plaintiff is treated after undergoing the examination of the operation function of a middle-class vehicle by being placed in the 3 camping Education Team around May of the same year, and completing the examination of the operation function of a middle-class vehicle, and changing the language in order to implement the training for road driving, the Plaintiff is treated after receiving the examination of the habit-oriented decris in the process of accelerating the technologies.
6. 20. D Hospital received an operation on the right shoulder;
As a result, it is difficult to use the left-hand shoulder instead of the right-hand shoulder after returning to the self-defense, it is in the middle of July of the same year.