On June 2, 2015, at around 20:20, the Defendant received 112 reports from the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu 200 “Soldo department store store,” and sent to the police box affiliated with the Seoul East-gu Police Station B police station, and asked the Defendant to ask him about the above details of the report. The Defendant: (a) took a bath to the Defendant, “I want to kill the flag, refund the flag, cut the flag, cut the blag; and (b) took tear of the envelope containing clothes, and used the clothes containing the above C’s face.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. 112 Details of processing, details of reporting and processing, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as clothes held by the person under consideration;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the reasons for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, and the reasons therefor;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to five years; and

2. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (referring to six months to one year and four months from imprisonment) of the type of the one (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) shall be limited to the scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria.

3. The defendant, upon receiving a report 112 and being asked the police officer to check the reported contents, shall be sentenced to punishment as ordered, taking into consideration the following circumstances: (a) the circumstances and methods of the crime are considerably poor; (b) the defendant has been punished for violent crimes; (c) the defendant has recognized his own crime at the police investigation stage; and (d) the defendant's age, family relation, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, family relation, etc.