도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 17, 2004, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine of KRW 1,500,000,000,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, from the Daegu District Court Port Branch on December 15, 2009 to a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine of KRW 1,50,00 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and from the Daegu District Court’s Young-gu District Court’s Young-gu Branch on November 22, 2017 to a summary order of KRW 2,50,00
1. On June 3, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol from blood alcohol level of 0.076% at around June 21, 201, driving a eco-sports car without obtaining a driver’s license from the Do before the “C Frequency” located in the Gungjin-gun B to the front of the “Dpenta” road.
As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, drives a motor vehicle in a drunken state in violation of the above provision, and simultaneously drives a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.
2. The Defendant, as stated in Paragraph 1 at the date and time, at the place specified in Paragraph 1, stated “H” in the driver’s statement column stating that “I will confirm that the above information is true, be notified that the license is (re-registration suspension) due to driving, and be notified that blood collection is not expected,” and sign the “H” in the driver’s statement column stating that “I will confirm that the above information is true, and the license is (re-registration suspension suspension suspension).”
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the H’s circumstantial statement report, which is a private document pertaining to any certification of fact, and submitted to G, who is aware of the forgery, the circumstantial statement report, as seen above, is genuine.