When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is an unemployed person, and the victim C is a friendly child with the victim C.

A. The Defendant, at around 11:00 on October 16, 2013, at the E elementary school principal school room located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant would have to transfer the ownership of an apartment leased in the name of the mother of the deceased father, but the mother failed to transfer the ownership due to his or her failure to affix his or her seal to the principal F of the E elementary school.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out facts by talking “.”

B. Around November 13:00 on November 5, 2013, at the place where “A” is an unspecified student of the meal service room, “prison is a false horse dispute, and the scarbing of scarbs is a false horse dispute.”

2) At around 13:00 on December 18, 2013, around 13:5, the class of “A” and class of 3th 5th 5th 2013, it publicly insultd that “Is and Isssssssssss must do so by falsity.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by C by the witness in the third public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the witness F in the fourth public trial record;

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion about the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion against the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion about defamation of the defendant on October 16, 2013 among the criminal facts stated in the judgment is not intentional, and the performance of the defamation is not recognized, and each insult of the persons on November 5, 2013 and December 18, 2013 did not appear to be between E elementary school meal rooms, and there was no fact that they made a insulting speech while being small in classrooms.

According to the evidence of the judgment, including the following circumstances, the criminal facts of the judgment are sufficiently recognized, and in other words, the defendant at the time of October 16, 2013, the open door between E elementary school teachers’ offices and principals of E elementary school teachers’ offices is the same as the criminal facts of the judgment.