When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 28, 2019, the Defendant damaged the property that is the victim’s property owned by the city, by causing the victim’s inner diameter to fall away from the floor, while assaulting the victim D in front of C High School located in C High School B, Sinsi-si, Seoul High School (hereinafter referred to as “C High School”) and causing the victim to fall from the floor, and causing the victim’s inner diameter to fall from the floor.

2. On April 28, 2019, around 01:05, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting the Defendant, who was at the top of Chigh School located in C High School B, and was dispatched after receiving the 112 report of the assault incident, and the Defendant was able to go to the victim, and the Defendant was able to go to the victim, thereby keeping the said F’s body in good hands, leading the Defendant to go to go to the knife at one time by hand, and raising F’s knife at one hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the E District Work Site and investigation report (with respect to the reasons why the land is destroyed);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant: (a) around 00:47 on April 28, 2019, on the street in front of Chigh School located in Sinsi-si B; (b) on the ground that the Defendant’s wife was aboard a taxi operated by the victim D (year 61) but was denied boarding on the ground that he was Seoul taxi; and (c) on the ground that he was said to be Seoul taxi, the Defendant committed assaulting the victim, i.e., e., e., e., g., g., dumping the bage of the victim at the victim’s request.

2. We examine the judgment, which is the Criminal Act.