beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.07.05 2019가단206950

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff maintained a de facto marital relationship from around 2002 to C, and completed the marriage report in 2009, but divorced around April 2016.

B. C: (a) died on July 7, 2018; (b) the Defendant, his child, succeeded to the deceased C, and the registration of transfer was completed in the name of the Defendant on the ground of inheritance of the instant real estate; (b)

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff purchased the instant real estate and entrusted the deceased C with only the title of its ownership, and sought implementation of the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on the termination of title trust on the date of delivery of the instant complaint against the Defendant who inherited C.

B. In light of the facts that the Plaintiff did not hold any document as to the right to the instant real estate solely based on the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 2-1 through 17, the Plaintiff’s claim is unacceptable on the grounds that: (a) the money transferred by the Plaintiff to the deceased from April 24, 2002 to April 24, 2002 after purchasing the instant real estate and completing the registration of transfer; and (b) the Plaintiff did not have any legal claim as to the instant real estate at the time of divorce; and (c) there was no other legal claim as to the instant real estate.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.